Tools

The Peer Review system tries to guarantee the quality and rigor of scientific publications to maintain the integrity of science, thus being one of the most important and complex parts of scientific journals. The quality of the review texts must be supervised to try to achieve excellence, due to the credibility of the scientific process will depend on it, in this way if the reviews have the quality enough, it will be guaranteed that the science that is published is
good, helping the advancement of society.

Until now, there have been developed studies and tools that allow us to identify how good or bad the review is. However, it has not been possible to materialize these studies in a tool that allows them to do it in a semi-automatic way.

This tool aims to analyze the quality of the review texts of scientific articles, providing recognition to the reviewers and the possibility of checking for themselves how complete their text is and how aligned it is with the rest. The application allows to know the quality of the reviews, understanding by quality text that takes into account 10 quality dimensions, in a visual and dynamic way through a web application and through requests to a REST API. In this way, there will be the possibility of being able to integrate this quality analysis of the revision texts in other platforms through the API.